- Edit
- RecentChanges
- History
- Preferences
- ?Discussion
Widescreeeeeeeeen
2006/04/20 16:26:00
A couple of weeks ago I finally gave in and brought a new monitor. Having already dropped the resolution on my old 19″ CRT to 1024×768 because the picture was a bit fuzzy I was now starting to bump up the font size and so I decided enough was enough.
After doing some reading and looking at what was available I had decided on a good 17″ LCD being the thing to get. This would give me a decent dot pitch and still be cheap. So off we went to PCWorld to do some research.
We stopped off at the apple store so that I could lust over the
£2000 30″ display before getting back to real life! Then at
PCworld we had the usual problems with getting staff who know what
a DVI input is and having a spec sheet that is in some way related
to the monitor it is next to. My favoriate was the fact that all
the PC were setup to show really bad resolutions so that no matter
what monitor you looked at they all looked really poor. So after a
little tweaking and loading in some test photos from Sarahs USB
memory stick I was totally confused. I still liked the idea of a
17″ with the option of adding a second later, 19″ were just to big
for the 1280×1024 resolution, but now some of the widescreen ones
were tempting me.
Off to Smiths for some research, copies of a couple of PC magazines
that were doing specials on monitors and then it was back home for
some serious research.
Some time later and a lot of reading and I had the following
- Philips Brilliance 200W6 - 20″ Widescreen - 1680×1050 - £330
- Dell 2405FP - 24″ Widescreen - 1920 x 1200 - £600
- Philips 170B6 - 17″ - 1024×768 - £170
- Apple 30″ Cinema - 2560 x 1600- £1800!!!
So as usual a full range, there were also a number of others,
sony
?ExtraBright and Acer. I also looked at Eizo range as well because they
have the best colour or so I am told but they were just too
expensive.
In the end I went for the Philips wide screen, it was a little more
than I had wanted to spend (like that is the first time that has
happend) but I think it’s worth it. It has the higher dot pitch
like the 17″ but gives me an extra half a screen on the side. Clear
and bright and the brightness is consistant from all angles which
is good for photos. It is taking me some time to get used to having
all this desktop space but photo editing and programming where I
need a lot of windows on the screen are a lot easier. Well worth
the spend.
To top it all off I brought it from PCWorld because they were £30
cheaper than anybody else then when I got there the only one they
had was a return that was working fine and so they knocked another
5% off.
To try and justify this in some way it does use a lot more power than the old CRT, 33W as opposed to over 80. And it is Lead free!
Anybody want a slightly fuzzy 19″ CRT monitor? Free to a good ( or any ) home.
Listen to this podcast

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License.